Top 5 Reasons Corrosion Management Often Fails Before it Begins
February 4, 2022 •Corrosion CONTROLLED, Corrosion Management
The corrosion management implementation process comprises three phases: the pre-implementation phase, the implementation phase, and the post-implementation phase.While the foremost implementation issue currently is not implementing or carrying out the corrosion management process at all, any possible issue or shortcoming pertaining to the process could be associated with any of the three phases.
The following will focus on issues associated with the first phase in the corrosion management process, the pre-implementation phase, the foundation for program success.
1. Scope of Work Shortcomings
Any shortcomings with respect to the work’s scope, such as ambiguities or erroneous instructions, specifications, requirements, and prerequisites would produce a defective, inefficient, incomplete, or erroneous corrosion management implementation process and outcome. Typical shortcomings or problematic issues associated with the scope of work could include the following:
• Unclear or vague work or project physical boundary
• Unclear system(s) or equipment inclusion or exclusion statements or specifications
• Ambiguous description of the work to be carried out
Any other similar poor and inadequate information, instructions, clarifications, or drawings could also further render the scope of work less transparent, clear, and practical. It would then adversely affect the whole corrosion management implementation process and its outcome.
2. Lack of or Inadequate Management Support
One of the crucial prerequisites for any successful corrosion management implementation process is the allocation of the appropriate required resources by management. Any shortcomings in the provision of the required resources could lead to an incomplete and ineffective implementation process. It is of paramount importance that adequate corrosion management awareness training be provided for the relevant senior management, so they would realize and fully appreciate the significance of the corrosion management implementation process and its potential benefits. Field observation has demonstrated, for various cases, the utter failure of the intended implementation process when management was not engaged from the beginning.
3. Lack of or Inadequate Site Personnel Training or Competency
The implementation process is always carried out with the help, support, and cooperation of the site personnel. Therefore, prior to any implementation, adequate corrosion management training should be provided to the pertinent site personnel. Any possible shortcomings associated with site personnel (corrosion management) training could simply derail the entire implementation process. Past field experience has shown that when prior training is not provided for the relevant personnel, the implementation process would not go far and would achieve very little, if at all.
4. Lack of or Unreliable Data
One of the major issues associated with some implementation processes is the lack of sufficient input data or the inclusion of unreliable data and information. Lack of certain crucial data could almost totally stall the implementation process, while the provision of unreliable data could lead to the generation of erroneous outputs (e.g., corrosion rates and risk levels) and subsequent conclusions.
5. Inadequate Team Structure and Job Descriptions
The corrosion management implementation process is a team exercise where every participating individual should be fully aware of their relevant responsibility within the team. Any possible lack of inadequate team structure and/or job descriptions would often lead to task or activity overlap or partial or total oversight of certain responsibilities, leading to a poor or incomplete implementation process.
Get assistance with changing how corrosion control decisions are made in your organization. Learn about IMPACT PLUS®, an innovative product developed in response to the NACE IMPACT Study and the challenges faced by industry in putting a CMS into a management context.
Source: materialperformance.com; written by Ali LI Morshed, consulting corrosion engineer and author of An Introduction of Asset Corrosion Management in the Oil and Gas Industry, An Introduction to Corrosion Management In Industry, and A Complete Guide to Corrosion Management Implementation. Purchase titles at the AMPP Store.
- advanced coating materials
- Advanced Corrosion Control in Oil and Gas Industry
- amusement parks
- asset integrity
- Asset Protection
- biodeterioration of materials
- cathodic protection-CP
- ceramic epoxies
- Chemical Injection
- coatings measurement and inspection
- corrosion basics
- corrosion control
- corrosion control and management
- corrosion essentials
- Data Monitoring
- Department of Defense
- dissolved gases
- energy industry
- flexible coatings
- Flint, Michigan
- fluoropolymer coating
- freshwater salinization
- Fusion-bonded epoxy
- industrial application
- Intumescent Coatings
- maritime coatings
- maritime industry
- microbiological forms
- microbiologically influenced corrosion-MIC
- Mineral constituents
- Oil Fields
- organic matter
- paint and protective coatings
- Petrochemical Plant Fireproofing Methods
- Petrochemical Plants
- power plant
- Protective Coatings
- Real-Time Corrosion Monitoring in Oil Fields
- remote monitoring and drones
- Road deicers
- roller coaster
- salt pollution
- ship coatings
- Structural Steel
- surface preparation
- sustainability and corrosion
- Water crisis
- Water pipe corrosion
- water quality
- water tank coatings
- water/treatment infrastructure
- Waterway salinity