How to Collect Samples for Diagnosing Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion
July 28, 2021 •Corrosion CONTROLLED, Corrosion Essentials, MIC

When microorganisms play a role in materials corrosion, it is known as microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC). A most significant challenge faced by corrosion professionals in identifying MIC is connecting the microorganisms found in a system to the corrosion experienced by that system as the presence of microorganisms alone does not necessarily mean they are the cause of the localized corrosion.
There are usually multiple factors in any given environment that contribute to corrosion, and different corrosion mechanisms, including MIC, can result in the same corrosion structure. Therefore, it is critical to verify a clear relationship between the biofilm and corrosion.
To properly diagnose MIC, investigations should include a combination of chemical, metallurgical, and microbiological analyses.
The detection, testing, and evaluation of MIC on internal pipeline surfaces is outlined in NACE International Standard TM0212-2012, which also provides guidelines on sample collection, testing methods, corrosion monitoring, as well as how to relate results to MIC.
Below are the criteria for conducting sampling to diagnose MIC as prescribed in Standard TM0212-2012:
• Sampling programs generally collect information on operating conditions, corrosion rates, and microbiological conditions over a period of time in order to identify any trends in the findings.
• Also, due to normal statistical variations associated with sample collection and microbiological testing, more reliable data typically result from performing tests on samples representing a time range rather than any single sample.
• Data collection and analysis should focus on differentiating the effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the likelihood, location, cause, and severity of internal corrosion.
• Samples of bulk fluids from pipelines are often collected to identify and quantify levels of planktonic (moving) microorganisms.
• To ensure that test results are relevant to MIC, data from bulk fluids should be correlated with other pipeline data, including liquid composition, operational conditions, sessile (attached) microorganism counts, and corrosion data.
• Since both corrosion and microbiological activity may occur directly on the internal surfaces of a pipeline, samples that are representative of these surfaces may provide significant information and should be collected, whenever possible, in conjunction with each liquid sample retrieved.
Richard B. Eckert, senior principal engineer—corrosion management, Materials Advisory Services, with DNV GL—North America Oil & Gas and chair of NACE Task Group (TG) 254, which published the standard, notes that it can be very difficult to infer what is happening on the pipeline’s internal surface based solely on the composition of the bulk fluid because there isn’t always a clear relationship between what is found on the surface and what comprises the bulk fluid phase.
The microorganisms living in the bulk fluid (types and quantities of microbes), and even the chemical composition of the bulk fluid, can be far different than what is found on the internal pipe surface—that’s been well established in research.
Reference & Note: NACE TM0212-2012, “Detection, Testing, and Evaluation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion on Internal Surfaces of Pipelines” (Houston, TX: NACE International, 2012). The methods presented in this standard /article represent the consensus of industry experts in pipeline corrosion and microbiology at the time this standard was published. See TM0212-2018-SG for 2018 revision.
Find microbiologically influenced corrosion resources here.
Source: Excerpt from an article that previously appeared on materialsperformance.com.
FREE DOWNLOADS
White Paper: An Action Plan for Reducing Pipeline Failures, Costs with Corrosion in the Water Sector
Special Report: The Future of Corrosion Control, Insights from the Experts
Get Updates
Featured Articles
Categories
- advanced coating materials (10)
- Advanced Corrosion Control in Oil and Gas Industry (1)
- aircraft (1)
- alkanization (1)
- amusement parks (3)
- asset integrity (9)
- Asset Protection (1)
- biodeterioration of materials (5)
- biofouling (4)
- bridges (2)
- cathodic protection-CP (14)
- ceramic epoxies (1)
- Chemical Injection (1)
- coatings (7)
- coatings measurement and inspection (9)
- concrete (13)
- corrosion basics (3)
- corrosion control (8)
- corrosion control and management (22)
- corrosion essentials (17)
- Data Monitoring (1)
- Department of Defense (1)
- dissolved gases (1)
- DoD (1)
- energy industry (9)
- epoxy (2)
- fireproofing (1)
- flexible coatings (3)
- Flint, Michigan (1)
- fluoropolymer coating (3)
- freshwater salinization (1)
- Fusion-bonded epoxy (1)
- industrial application (2)
- Intumescent Coatings (1)
- maritime coatings (10)
- maritime industry (11)
- microbiological forms (1)
- microbiologically influenced corrosion-MIC (11)
- military (1)
- Mineral constituents (1)
- Oil Fields (1)
- organic matter (1)
- oxgen (1)
- paint and protective coatings (32)
- Petrochemical Plant Fireproofing Methods (1)
- Petrochemical Plants (1)
- power plant (1)
- Protective Coatings (1)
- Real-Time Corrosion Monitoring in Oil Fields (1)
- reliability (1)
- remote monitoring and drones (4)
- Road deicers (1)
- roller coaster (1)
- salt pollution (1)
- sensors (1)
- ship coatings (7)
- shiptanks (1)
- standards (5)
- steel (7)
- Structural Steel (1)
- surface preparation (11)
- sustainability and corrosion (7)
- turbine (1)
- Water crisis (1)
- Water pipe corrosion (1)
- water quality (1)
- water tank coatings (5)
- water/treatment infrastructure (21)
- Waterway salinity (1)