Effective CP System Proves Important in Protecting against MIC in Oil Tank
March 4, 2022 •Corrosion CONTROLLED, Corrosion Essentials, CP
A refinery was experiencing bottom plate underside (soil-side) corrosion of its aboveground storage tanks at an extraordinarily high rate of 1 to 2 mm/y, which resulted in the failure of four tanks within a two-year period that occurred seven years after the refinery was commissioned. All four tanks had severely damaged bottom plates, which were constructed of 8-mm thick uncoated carbon steel.
Underside corrosion protection for the tanks was provided by an impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) system using a mixed-metal oxide (MMO) grid anode system. The corrosion morphology after the failure revealed severe localized corrosion with large, deep pits found under deposits of orange-red tubercles comprised of iron oxides.
A NACE International CORROSION paper titled, “Premature Failure of API 650 Oil Storage Tank Bottom Plates Due to Soil Side Corrosion,” described the failure analysis carried out, which included a review of the design and function of the CP system and metallurgical tests of a failed bottom plate sample.
For the ICCP system, the MMO anode grid was placed between a high-density polyethylene secondary containment liner and the tank bottom, which sat on a 75-mm thick sand pad. The underside of the bottom plates was uncoated and the CP design was based on 100% bare surface area.
The failures occurred over a two-year period and a detailed CP survey was carried out for the storage tanks six months later. The results revealed that none of the tanks achieved the NACE SP0193-20161 protection criterion of –850 mV instant “off” potential. The potentials varied from –200 to –800 mV vs. a copper/copper sulfate (Cu/CuSO4) electrode (CSE), with an average “off” potential of –450 mV vs. CSE across all tanks.
A 100-by-100 mm hole was observed when layers of metal were removed from the sample’s soil side.
Since the potentials were not meeting the –850 mV criteria, further investigation was done to understand the possible reasons for such low polarized potentials. The paper notes that design deficiencies of the ICCP system—primarily the anode depth/spacing and inappropriate distribution of power feed cables—resulted in a nonuniform potential profile across the tank bottom surface. High current and voltage attenuation along the anode grid did not provide sufficient current and polarization at a distance away from the power feeds, which led to under-protection of the tank bottom.
Because an inefficient CP system alone typically doesn’t cause such aggravated corrosion, a sample from the failed tank bottom was sent to an external laboratory for a detailed metallurgical analysis to identify corrosion products and possible corrosion mechanisms. A form of underdeposit corrosion (UDC) that can corrode steel at the rate of 1 mm/year is microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC).
X-ray diffraction analysis of the sample plates’ soil side indicated the tubercles were made of porous layers or strata consisting mainly of iron oxides surrounded by magnetite (Fe3O4). The scales appeared to consist of multiple layers. A closer analysis performed on flakes from scale on the pits indicated the probability of iron-oxidizing bacteria (IOB) present in the corrosion, which formed deposits that further aggravated the corrosion by forming a differential aeration cell. IOB produce orange-red tubercles of iron oxides and hydroxides by oxidizing ferrous ions from the bulk medium or the substratum.
The corrosion rates observed were amplified by the ingress of water, primarily from leaking fire water sprinklers, through gaps between the annular plate and foundation, which brought in bacteria and corrosive anions such as chlorides and sulfates. Without an effective CP system and no other means of corrosion control, the tank floor was exposed to a severe form of bacterial and UDC that led to perforation and loss of inventory.
See AMPP’s Cathodic Protection Program -- courses and certifications for success in the field.
Source: repurposed with permission from materialperformance.com; article based on NACE CORROSION paper no. 9025, “Premature Failure of API 650 Oil Storage Tank Bottom Plates Due to Soil Side Corrosion” authored by N. Al Abri, J.R Nair, A. Al Ghafri, and F. Al Mawali
- advanced coating materials
- Advanced Corrosion Control in Oil and Gas Industry
- amusement parks
- asset integrity
- Asset Protection
- biodeterioration of materials
- cathodic protection-CP
- ceramic epoxies
- Chemical Injection
- coatings measurement and inspection
- corrosion basics
- corrosion control
- corrosion control and management
- corrosion essentials
- Data Monitoring
- Department of Defense
- dissolved gases
- energy industry
- flexible coatings
- Flint, Michigan
- fluoropolymer coating
- freshwater salinization
- Fusion-bonded epoxy
- industrial application
- Intumescent Coatings
- maritime coatings
- maritime industry
- microbiological forms
- microbiologically influenced corrosion-MIC
- Mineral constituents
- Oil Fields
- organic matter
- paint and protective coatings
- Petrochemical Plant Fireproofing Methods
- Petrochemical Plants
- power plant
- Protective Coatings
- Real-Time Corrosion Monitoring in Oil Fields
- remote monitoring and drones
- Road deicers
- roller coaster
- salt pollution
- ship coatings
- Structural Steel
- surface preparation
- sustainability and corrosion
- Water crisis
- Water pipe corrosion
- water quality
- water tank coatings
- water/treatment infrastructure
- Waterway salinity